DIRECTIONS, THIS IS NOT A PAPER JUST THREE SEPARATE PARAGRAPHS
• Critique the dialogues that other students created. Was the dialogue plausible? Accurate? Interesting?
• Very NICELY Critique Brittany Monteleone, Chelsea Bettencourt and Samantha Kern. NOT A SUMMARY OF THE STUDENT: I would start off like “Hey Brittany well-written dialogue……. or Chelsea, I really enjoyed reading your dialogue because …..”
• I ATTACH THE DOCUMENT UNDER WK 12 Brittany;Chelsea;Samantha
• AGAIN, THIS SHOULD BE A PARAGRAPH DISCUSS/CRITIQUE. GRAMMER IS NOT PART OF THE CRITIQUE. JUST WHAT WE THINK ABOUT THE Dialogue. Again, it has to be very friendly and nice to respond to their post.
EXAMPLE:
SOMEONE CRITIQUE Chelsea post LIKE (DO NOT COPY THIS IS FROM OTHER STUDENTS, IT JUST AN IDEA OF HOW IT SHOULD BE LIKE)
Hi Chelsea,
I think you may have mixed up the names on your conversation. Trixie is supposed to be the AAW, and Penelope the WKKK. If you switch the names around, I think you have their attitudes toward each other correct. However, I think it would have been important to add the contributions of the African American organizations in cleaning up their communities and increasing education for women and children. I would also have added that the appeal of the WKKK was the feeling of political equality for women.
PLEASE DON’T COPY BC THIS WAS FROM ANOTHER student.
Below was the original assignment, below is not the assignment it just to get an idea of the topic of the dialogue that was assigned. .
• There are two women caught in a hostage situation in 1922. One is an African-American woman and one is a white woman who is a member of the Ku Klux Klan. They fear for their lives and after hours went by …they decide to talk to each other. The African American women defends the role she and her people played in the making of the nation. The white woman defends her position as a member of the Ku Klux Klan.