EssayCombo.com

Read the Ace Heating and Cooling scenario in your text and answer the following questions:

Ace Heating and Cooling sells air conditioners. One unit, the Freezy, has a fair market value of $300. During a heat wave, Ace sells a Freezy air conditioner for $500 to each of the following:

Breanna, single mom with poor credit, who can’t afford to pay cash for an AC unit. Breanna signs a contract to pay $500 on a credit plan, with an additional $300 in interest and financing fees.
Barry Bigshot, investment banker, who knows the price is way too high but who is far too important to waste his time driving around town trying to get a better deal.
Glamour Café, a fancy restaurant with an upscale clientele, whose AC went out in the middle of the lunch rush. The manager is desperate to get the place cooled down before people like Barry Bigshot come in for the evening happy hour.
Shady Rest Nursing Home, a business that barely makes a profit. The manager isn’t happy about the price, but old people are very vulnerable to heat, and she’s afraid that her patients’ health could be compromised by any delay in getting AC.

Under UCC 2-302, who has the best chance of getting out of the contract due to unconsionability?
The symbol for justice features a woman wearing a blindfold illustrating that the law should be applied the same way regardless of who the parties are. Does the UCC rule seem to contradict this? Which approach do you think is more ethical?
Note that both Glamour and Shady Rest are businesses, and courts rarely find that contracts between two businesses are unconscionable. The rationale is that a business is a sophisticated entity, familiar with transactions and able to protect itself. Do you think Glamour and Shady Rest are in a comparable position in regard to this contract? Why or why not?

In writing your papers you will concisely and explicitly express (a) the issue being addressed, (b) the position you are taking on the issue as you have expressed it, and (c) three primary premises in support of that position. Once you have written this “skeletal form” of the argument, you will then (d) write a paragraph length discussion/explanation of your premises and how they support your position/conclusion. The numbered premises of the skeletal argument will serve as the topic sentences for each individual paragraph of support. Use only simple declarative sentences to express the skeletal argument. Each paper will adhere to this format. These argument papers must be developed based on your own ideas and thinking, and should not be considered research paper(s). Outside resources are allowed. Here is an example of what the format should look like: Issue: Whether the 1965 Minnesota Twins could have beaten the 2010 New York Yankees in a 7 Game Series. Position: 1965 Minnesota Twins could have beaten the 2010 New York Yankees in a 7 Game Series. Premise 1: The Twins 4 man pitching rotation, lead by Jim Kaat, stacks up better in a seven game series. Premise 2: The Twins defense was stronger at every position. Premise 3: The Twins had better all around hitting, with sluggers like Harmon Killebrew, Bob Allison, and Tony Oliva (A.L. Rookie of the year in 1964) and great contact hitters like Zoilo Versalles (A.L. MVP in 1965). *(NOTE: I am in favor of the necessary changes needed to curve the obesity rate in the United States. Drastic measures need to be implemented in order to save more lives from pre-mature health problems and even death).