Read the case and write a paper answering the following questions:
what is the theory of international law espoused by the majority of the court?
What is the problem with this theory if any or weakness?
What is the argument of the French gov’t — why does it believe that the exercise of jurisdiction by Turkey over a French officer is wrong?
What is the basis of Turkish jurisdiction over the French officer?
Also what are the legal arguments raised by France?
Is there a treaty — between Turkey and France (on this issue)?
If there is on treaty then what must be the source of law?
What two elements does the PCIJ have to consider in order to prove a rule of custom?
What is the standard?