A Critical Literature Review
Required to carry a critical review of peer-reviewed academic articles. Note that the term Supply Chain Management (SCM) here means that if you want to focus on Procurement, this is possible as Procurement may be viewed as part of SCM.
• New Technology impact on Supply Chain Management (Topic)
This task requires the selection of a minimum of five (5) articles taken from at least five (5) different journals. FOUR of these articles should be original research articles. The other may be either/both Conceptual papers or Literature Reviews. The length of these articles should be a minimum of eight (8) pages, excluding the references or diagrams. Shorter journals can still be used to support your position or arguments but cannot be included as one of the five core articles.
You will need to focus your Review. For example, New Technology impact on SCM could have a focus on use of automation in warehousing OR a focus on use of IT systems in transport logistics/supply chain. Business Intelligence and SCM could focus on a new technology such as Block Chain. Do not attempt to cover several areas, choose your focus.
It is recommended that when writing on use of technology in Supply Chain, references should be no more than five years old. Where older, you need to show that the source you have cited remains current, for example by showing newer sources are using the older work
STRUCTURE
(VERY important to be structure in this way)
• Introduction
• Findings (presented in a TABLE – must – shown in PowerPoint presentation)
• Analysis
• Conclusion
Introduction; 15%
• An overview of the topic chosen, and the articles chosen, justification, relevance, coherence.
Presentation of Findings 30%
These should be presented as a TABLE showing ONLY THE FIVE CORE sources used, Summary of the findings, Methodology (if applicable), Strengths of the Source, Weakness of the Source and a column stating overall relevance of the source.
Critical Analysis; 40%
• Gaps in research,
• Strengths of the papers,
• Weaknesses of the papers,
• Value of arguments/findings,
• Where should future research focus?
General 15%
• Full bibliographic details for each of the core articles
• Referencing [this is separate to the bibliographic details of the core articles]
• Structure and Presentation
Please use Harvard referencing
23 sources (including the 5 core ones)