Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management

In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250 word paper describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

Select an issue from the following list: bullying, unit closers and restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), or magnet designation.
Describe the selected issue. Discuss how it impacts quality of care and patient safety in the setting in which it occurs.
Discuss how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct.
Explain the differing roles of nursing leaders and nursing managers in this instance and discuss the different approaches they take to address the selected issue and promote patient safety and quality care. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.
Discuss what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate in order to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue.
Describe a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue. Explain why this style could be successful in this setting.
Use at least three peer-reviewed journal articles other than those presented in your text or provided in the course.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,

HLTH 511 – Research Project

Please follow the RESEARCH PROJECT INSTRUCTIONS documents attached. AMA format please.

Please see ALL documents attached.

4 pages NOT INCLUDING the title page, references, data, graphs, tables pictures, figures.. etc..

Creating a quantitaive Survey for masters dissertation

A quantitative survey should be created, which can be used for the following masters dissertation.

“Role of HR Management and Big Data from an ethical perspective — An empirical investigation regarding employers’ and employees’ perspective”

With this survey at least 50+ Employees from different companies within the industry sector should be asked regarding the above mentioned topic.

Please find attached the dissertation proposal for more details regarding topic and background.

Creating a qualititative Interview Framework for masters dissertation

A qualitative interview framework should be created, which can be used for the following masters dissertation.

“Role of HR Management and Big Data from an ethical perspective — An empirical investigation regarding employers’ and employees’ perspective”

With this interview framework at least 5 HR Managers/Directors from different companies within the industry sector should be interviewed regarding the above mentioned topic.

Please find attached the dissertation proposal for more details regarding topic and background.

The catch 22 of Pemancar through a paradox lens

Pemancar has been subjected to a strategy and top-management-shift. From a well-performing & people-oriented organization, where the complex was kept simple by ‘as long as the bottom line looks good, we are all happy’ fueled by the trust for its people (Abdullah & Siti-Nabiha,2012) – the new strategy is semi-rigid, initiated by Nova. The new procedures leave very little room for multidimensional novelty (Miron-Spektor & Erez,2017) and all are expected to do ‘more with less’. The culture has deteriorated by constant problems without solutions, as Nova makes the high expectations on individuals very clear, yet indirectly stripping the organization of skills retention, power of diversity, and other factors necessary for the expected and intended performance. The ‘what’s in it for me’ aspects (Zigarami,2009) and autonomy from an individual perspective becomes lost in translation by inconsiderate trade-offs.

Many changes occur simultaneously, leaving the employees with a sense of chaos and low self-esteem in performance (Abdullah & Siti-Nabiha,2012), by a lack of information, and poor communications/goals for shop-floor workers. The Catch 22 of aiming for growth – yet end up in a worse place due to ignoring vital business and human factors and local adjustment is a difficult situation to recover from. Danial has a rocky road ahead, to re-gain the trust of the stakeholders, and to differentiate approach from theory (Nasim & Sushil,2011) will require a balance.

To balance the paradox of sustainable continuity, and crucial change is critical. Pemancar requires a flexible framework, despite the pressure of semi-rigid processes, and the perception of that ‘one global size fits all’- even for an organization new to the East Policy (Abdullah & Siti-Nabiha,2012).

All organizations will at some point experience contradictions, and to find a way to see the logic in what is not always logical can be a challenge. Especially whilst under the scrutiny of a manager being expected to spend more time on meetings and financial reports (Abdullah & Siti-Nabiha,2012) than on actually leading the people through change. The risk of positivity and paralyzation is also vast, by lack of skills, uniform processes and de-motivation from little empowerment. The information flow must, therefore, be improved to start with.

Not everything is solved by reviewing .e.g a balanced scorecard (Nasim & Sushil,2011). Hence, performance from various aspects of what is value-adding and what is not must be considered, to motivate the staff, by proving to all stakeholders that productivity and progress comes in many shapes, depending on from what angle it is being viewed.

The theory of higher productivity by cutting staff often looks good on paper, but not in practice when suddenly our key-skills are lost, creating gaps between e.g. quality and costs. Danial’s influence in bringing the management as well as employee mindset back on track will play a crucial part going forth. By adhering to the team-perspective (Li, She & Yang, 2018) the individuals can be fostered to understand the world from other views – by collaboration and by the leader’s capability of balancing control/authorization with collaboration/individualism where all voices can be heard in a paradox leadership style. To maintain a high perspective (Li, She & Yang, 2018) – the information gap must firstly be filled (Zigarami,2009).

Finding the balance between continuity and change by viewing each challenge from a paradox lens with ideas that are both feasible and useful can bring the innovation management to its essence (Miron-Spektor & Erez,2017).

THOUGHTS – PLEASE USE ACADEMIC JOURNALS ONLY – ANY 3 OF YOUR CHOOSING OR FROM THOSE THAT ARE UPLOADED

mentoring

I will attach my assignment brief please do assignment number two and use uk English. I am volunteer for advocacy focus use them as example of my work if you can do some research about them http://www.advocacyfocus.org.uk/

Discussion

Discuss the purpose of strategic planning in a health care environment. Explain what factors affect future planning in an organization and what tools can be used for future planning.