3a. Integration
Is this a holistic (integrated) sustainability tool? That is, does it have the potential to address the environmental, economic, livability, and equity aspects of sustainability in an urban setting? Explain. (Base this analysis directly and entirely on the information presented in sections 1 and 2. Do not introduce any new evidence into this subsection.)
3b. Conflict
What potential for conflict between any two of the sustainability goals exists for this tool? (For instance, if a city were to implement this tool to enhance livability, could its implementation somehow negatively impact social equity?) (It is ok to be speculative / present a hypothetical example in this subsection.) Be sure to identify the conflict (e.g., the gentrification conflict).
Then, what kind of policy or mechanism might help to manage, minimize, or eliminate this conflict?
3c. Recommendation
Overall, do this tool’s benefits and potential outweigh its challenges, limitations, and shortcomings?
Should this tool be implemented more extensively in urban sustainability planning, and why or why not?
Implement a formal writing style (e.g., avoid slang). Use the third person (no “I” statements).
no intro or summary, just what is listed above.
sources must be scholarly journals or peer reviewed.
Sections written above must be completed using the paper that is attatched which has the information to use.