This case is regarding medical malpractice and Iturralde vs. Hilo Medical
Legal Component feedback:
I think you correctly identified the legal issues in the case, which is great, for both Dr. Ricketson and the hospital. However, this is where your legal analysis will go. For example, you mentioned that one legal issue is negligence. What are the elements? What are the rules of each element? What is your analysis for each element and what is your conclusion?
Malpractice Policies feedback:
Great job identifying the important policies. Please develop this section with more facts from the case. What additional facts demonstrate how they did or would have addressed the issues?
Standard of care feedback:
Good analysis of the standard of care. Please continue to develop this with facts from the case. The negligence analysis belongs in the legal components section. This section requires some additional analysis on the standard if care, but remember that standard of care is only one of four elements that comprise of a negligence claim.
Accountability feedback:
Please develop this section with facts and analyze whether the court got it right based on the severity of the actions.
Ethical issues feedback:
You identified some important facts that certainly involve ethical issues in the case. Consider developing this a little more. Why are the issues credited with causing the incident? Why are they ethical issues? What other research may contribute to this section? With all these sections, my recommendation is always to frame responses within the rubric requirement.
Shared-Decision Model feedback:
Explain the model before the analysis
The rest of the feedback was to continue to develop with facts from the case. I attached the final papers rubric as well to reference it and ensure all parts are answered and edited.
Please reach out if you need anything